Published by A&A Agency Updated at:

A&a

  Front-endAngularReactUIJavascriptWebsiteAppUXFirebaseHTML 5SASS developers  

Back

Comparing Redux and Hooks for state management in React

First published:

front-end developers
javascript
html
scss
coding tutorial
redux
react
state management
jsx

Comparing Redux and Hooks for state management in React, we look at the differences, pros/cons, and potential use-cases for each.

As a front-end developer, building a website or app using React has become the norm in recent years. JavaScript frameworks are increasingly becoming popular, and React is leading the pack. With React, developers can build complex and interactive user interfaces with ease. However, there are two significant approaches to state management in React: Redux and Hooks. In this article, we will explore the differences between the two approaches to help you make an informed decision about which one to use.

What is Redux?

Redux is a predictable state container for JavaScript apps. It provides a central location to manage application state in a predictable and straightforward way. Redux stores the application's state in a single store and uses reducers to modify the state. Redux follows the unidirectional data flow principle, which makes it easy to understand and maintain. Redux allows you to write pure functions that do not have side effects, making it easier to test your code.

Here's an example of how to create a Redux store and access it in a component:

// store.js import { createStore } from 'redux'; // Define the initial state of the store const initialState = { count: 0, }; // Define a reducer function to modify the state function reducer(state = initialState, action) { switch (action.type) { case 'INCREMENT': return { ...state, count: state.count + 1, }; case 'DECREMENT': return { ...state, count: state.count - 1, }; default: return state; } } // Create the store const store = createStore(reducer); export default store;

// Counter.js import { useSelector, useDispatch } from 'react-redux'; function Counter() { const count = useSelector(state => state.count); const dispatch = useDispatch(); return ( <div> <h1>Count: {count}</h1> <button onClick={() => dispatch({ type: 'INCREMENT' })}>+</button> <button onClick={() => dispatch({ type: 'DECREMENT' })}>-</button> </div> ); } export default Counter;

In this example, we define the store in a separate file called store.js. We define the initial state of the store and a reducer function that modifies the state based on actions. We then create the store using the createStore function from the redux library and export it.

In the Counter.js file, we use the useSelector hook from the react-redux library to access the count value from the store. We also use the useDispatch hook to dispatch actions to the store when the user clicks the + or - button.

What are Hooks?

Hooks are a new feature introduced in React 16.8. They allow developers to use state and other React features without writing a class. Hooks are functions that allow you to hook into the React lifecycle and state. The most commonly used hooks are useState, useEffect, useContext, and useRef. Hooks make it easier to write reusable code and share stateful logic between components.

Here's an example of how to use the useState hook to manage state in a component:

import { useState } from 'react'; function Counter() { const [count, setCount] = useState(0); function increment() { setCount(count + 1); } function decrement() { setCount(count - 1); } return ( <div> <h1>Count: {count}</h1> <button onClick={increment}>+</button> <button onClick={decrement}>-</button> </div> ); } export default Counter;

In this example, we use the useState hook to manage the count state. We define two functions, increment and decrement, that modify the state using the setCount function. We then render the count value and two buttons that call the increment and decrement functions when clicked.

Redux vs Hooks

Redux and Hooks are two different approaches to state management in React. Redux provides a centralized store and uses reducers to manage state changes. On the other hand, Hooks allow you to manage state within the component itself. Lets take a look at some of the pros and cons in the good ol' table format:

React Hooks

Redux

Advantages

Easier to learn and use

No need for complex setup

Good for small to medium-sized applications

Encourages writing reusable code

Share stateful logic between components

Predictable state management

Easy to debug

Centralized store for state management

Good for large-scale applications

Provides a dev tool for debugging

Disadvantages

Does not provide a centralized store

State management can become messy for large applications

Fewer support tools compared to Redux

Overkill for small applications

Can make the codebase harder to maintain

Learning curve

Boilerplate code

When to use Redux

Redux is an excellent option for large-scale applications with complex state management requirements. Redux is also an excellent choice for applications with a lot of shared state between components. With Redux, it's easy to maintain the state of an application and access it from any component in the application. Redux also provides a dev tool that makes it easy to debug your application.

When to use Hooks

Hooks are an excellent choice for small to medium-sized applications. Hooks allow you to manage state within the component itself, making it easier to write reusable code. Hooks also make it easier to share stateful logic between components. Hooks are also easier to learn and use compared to Redux.

Combined approach

Redux and Hooks can also be used together, giving you the best of both worlds. By using hooks with Redux, you can manage state within the component while still having a centralized store for state management. This approach provides the best of both worlds and can be useful in large-scale applications with complex state management requirements.

Here's an example of how you can use both Redux and Hooks for state management in a React application. In this example, we define the store using Redux and use the useSelector and useDispatch hooks to manage state within the component.

// store.js import { createStore } from 'redux'; // Define the initial state of the store const initialState = { count: 0, }; // Define a reducer function to modify the state function reducer(state = initialState, action) { switch (action.type) { case 'INCREMENT': return { ...state, count: state.count + 1, }; case 'DECREMENT': return { ...state, count: state.count - 1, }; default: return state; } } // Create the store const store = createStore(reducer); export default store;

// Counter.js import { useSelector, useDispatch } from 'react-redux'; import { useState } from 'react'; function Counter() { const count = useSelector(state => state.count); const dispatch = useDispatch(); const [localCount, setLocalCount] = useState(0); function increment() { dispatch({ type: 'INCREMENT' }); setLocalCount(localCount + 1); } function decrement() { dispatch({ type: 'DECREMENT' }); setLocalCount(localCount - 1); } return ( <div> <h1>Count: {count}</h1> <button onClick={increment}>+</button> <button onClick={decrement}>-</button> <h2>Local Count: {localCount}</h2> </div> ); } export default Counter;

In this example, we define the store in a separate file called store.js using Redux. We define the initial state of the store and a reducer function that modifies the state based on actions. We then create the store using the createStore function from the redux library and export it.

In the Counter.js file, we use the useSelector hook from the react-redux library to access the count value from the store. We also use the useDispatch hook to dispatch actions to the store when the user clicks the + or - button. Additionally, we use the useState hook to manage a local count state that is separate from the store's count state. When the user clicks the + or - button, we update both the store's count and the local count.

Using both Redux and Hooks together provides the best of both worlds, allowing you to manage state within the component while still having a centralized store for state management. This approach can be useful in large-scale applications with complex state management requirements.

Conclusion

In conclusion, choosing between Redux and Hooks depends on the project's size and complexity. Redux is an excellent choice for large applications with complex state management requirements, while Hooks are great for small to medium-sized applications. However, using both approaches together can give you the best of both worlds. As a front-end developer, it's essential to understand the pros and cons of each approach to make an informed decision about which one to use in your project.